Reading the Guidelines for conferring the title of National Artist of the Philippines on the National Commission for Culture and the Arts (NCCA) webpage, one learns that the “Order of National Artists aims to recognize:
- Filipino artists who have made significant contributions to the cultural heritage of the country.
- Filipino artistic accomplishment at its highest level and to promote creative expression as significant to the development of a national cultural identity.
- Filipino artists who have dedicated their lives to their works to forge new paths and directions for future generations of Filipino artists.”
Reading Pres. Gloria Arroyo’s newly proclaimed National Artists for 2009, one might wonder when the culture of corruption was officially acknowledged as part of our cultural heritage.
Yes, there could be a New Order of National Artists of the
What are the selection process and committees for?
The Guidelines clearly state that “[T]he order is jointly administered by the NCCA and the Cultural Center of the Philippines (CCP) and conferred by the President of the Philippines upon recommendation by both institutions”. Yet, of the 7 National Artists on Arroyo’s list, only 3 were chosen by the NCCA or CCP. 4 of the 7 were not recommended by the NCCA or the CCP.
So what guidelines were followed in choosing these 4: Cecile Guidote-Alvarez (wife of Presidential Adviser for climate change Heherson Alvarez), Carlo Magno Jose J. Caparas (famous for his comic strips and massacre films), architect Francisco “Bobby” MaƱosa and fashion designer Jose “Pitoy”
The Guidelines also state that “NCCA and CCP Board members and consultants and NCCA and CCP officers and staff are automatically disqualified from being nominated”. So what is NCCA Commissioner and Executive Director Cecile Guidote-Alvarez doing on Arroyo’s list as National Artist for Theater? Ms. Guidote-Alvarez is also the Presidential Adviser on Culture Affairs. She could be the National Artist for Conflict of Interest.
When asked for her comment on Virgilio Almario’s decision to decline his nomination as National Artist while the latter was then still NCCA Executive Director, Ms. Guidote-Alvarez merely stated the obvious by saying she was “not Almario”. Of course she’s not. Mr. Almario has a sense of what is improper.
Mr. Almario, being truly deserving of the title, was made National Artist in 2003. If an artist is confident of his/her achievements, he/she will not be worried about not receiving the honor in the future, from any president.
Criteria
Now we go to Arroyo’s National Artist for Visual Arts and Film. The Guidelines provide that the “Order of National Artists shall be given to:
- Living artists who are Filipino citizens at the time of nomination, as well as those who died after the establishment of the award in 1972 but were Filipino citizens at the time of their death;
- Artists who through the content and form of their works have contributed in building a Filipino sense of nationhood;
- Artists who have pioneered in a mode of creative expression or style, thus, earning distinction and making an impact on succeeding generations of artists;
- Artists who have created a substantial and significant body of works and/or consistently displayed excellence in the practice of their art form thus enriching artistic expression or style; and
- Artists who enjoy broad acceptance through:
· prestigious national and/or international recognition, such as the Gawad CCP Para sa Sining, CCP Thirteen Artists Award and NCCA Alab ng Haraya;
· critical acclaim and/or reviews of their works;
· respect and esteem from peers.”
Exactly which criterion did Carlo J. Caparas meet? He has never been known as an illustrator so the visual arts nod is incomprehensible. And to place him on the same level as filmmakers Lino Brocka, Ishmael Bernal, Gerry de Leon and Eddie Romero taints the renown associated with such names.
Dagdag-Bawas
Arroyo’s skill for adding-subtracting votes knows no bounds. What began during the presidential elections has been honed through the years by sheer lack of shame and manifest arrogance. The President is already given the prerogative of conferring the Presidential Medal of Merit. She can abuse that prerogative all she wants. Why venture into the highest Cultural Order, abuse presidential power and mess with the Order of the National Artist? What are rules for? She may be the nation’s poster girl for the culture and art of corruption but she should at least try to disprove it sometimes.