Showing posts with label Omnibus Election Code. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Omnibus Election Code. Show all posts

Tuesday, May 21, 2013

P5 COIN TRUMPS P1.8B PCOS MACHINE (San Teodoro elects its mayor via a coin toss)

By Siesta-friendly

We were unaware with how tied votes in any local or national elections are settled but when we learned that a tie in the election for the Mayor of San Teodoro in Mindoro was settled with a coin toss, we just had to check the rules. We note that it seems purely a coincidence that a coin was used and not because politicians are two-faced.


“Sec. 240. Election resulting in tie. - Whenever it shall appear from the canvass that two or more candidates have received an equal and highest number of votes, or in cases where two or more candidates are to be elected for the same position and two or more candidates received the same number of votes for the last place in the number to be elected, the board of canvassers, after recording this fact in its minutes, shall by resolution, upon five days notice to all the tied candidates, hold a special public meeting at which the board of canvassers shall proceed to the drawing of lots of the candidates who have tied and shall proclaim as elected the candidates who may be favored by luck, and the candidates so proclaimed shall have the right to assume office in the same manner as if he had been elected by plurality of vote. The board of canvassers shall forthwith make a certificate stating the name of the candidate who had been favored by luck and his proclamation on the basis thereof.

Nothing in this section shall be construed as depriving a candidate of his right to contest the election.” [Underline supplied.]

COMELEC Resolution No. 9648, under Section 28. i. 6. b, likewise states:

“In case there are candidates receiving the same number of votes for the same position, the Board immediately notify the said candidates to appear before them for the drawing of lots to break the tie. The drawing of lots should be conducted within one (1) hour after issuance of notice by the Board to the candidates concerned.” [Underline supplied.]

So why the coin toss? Apparently, it was the local election officer Mr. Reny Pagilagan’s suggestion -

“When the two candidates for mayor of San Teodoro were called to the election office Tuesday morning, Mr. Pagilagan said the two already knew what would happen but still deferred to the election officer to determine the manner of how to break the tie.
“I suggested a coin toss, with whoever flipping the most number of heads after five tries to be declared the winner. They agreed and when I searched my pocket for loose change, I found a five peso coin,” he said. As ground rule, the coin must be tossed by the candidates above their heads and the coin must bounce at least once on the tiled floor, he added.

As if the gods were also having problems making a choice, Mr. Py and Feraren were again tied after the first round, each flipping two heads after five chances.

The second round saw 49-year-old Mr. Feraren, brother of the outgoing town mayor Apollo Feraren, emerging as victor, flipping two heads to Mr. Py’s one.

“It was a suspense thriller,” said Mayor-elect Feraren, relieved the experience was already over.

Mr. Pagilagan said the two rivals embraced after the winner was declared.”

Was all that coin tossing legit? Are the candidates allowed to agree to a different form of settling ties even as the rules specify that there should be “drawing of lots”? Is coin tossing equivalent to drawing of lots?  We have yet to hear any objections to the San Teodoro result but considering how “precious” elective positions are treated in this country, we are waiting ….

It is ironic that despite the advances in technology and the fact that we now have automated elections reportedly costing P1.8B, the result of one contest was decided by a decidedly old method, the luck of the draw, or in this case, the toss of a P5 coin.


NEWER POST       |       PREVIOUS POST

Tuesday, May 18, 2010

WHAT IF THERE WAS A TIE? (Breaking ties in local and national elections)

By Siesta-friendly

Just to ventilate: we don’t understand why in the age of electronic transmission, election results transmission in the Philippines suddenly seem to be anachronistic.  Electronic mail can be received in a matter of seconds all around the world.  Yet, the remaining electronic data from ballot machines taken 8 days ago seem to be taking their sweet time or maybe being redirected around the universe to get where they should be.

Plus, continued reports of irregularities give more and more light to COMELEC’s incompetence:  from 60 PCOS (Precinct Count Optical Scan) machines being taken home by a PCOS technician to discrepancies between election data print-outs and the election data stored in the memory cards Not to mention the numerous PCOS machines breaking down since election day.

Time for a revamp of the entire COMELEC membership to have a more credible outcome next time.

So there.

The slow counting of votes for certain positions has also given us time to think about certain scenarios under the Omnibus Election Code like what happens when there is a tie for local and national posts (especially where the race seems close).

When the candidates for President or Vice President are tied

Upon the completion of the canvass of the votes by Congress, the candidates with the highest number of votes for President and for Vice-President shall be declared elected; but in case 2 or more shall have an equal and the highest number of votes, one of them shall be chosen President or Vice-President, as the case may be, by a majority vote of all the Members of Congress in session assembled. (Article II, Section 20, Omnibus Election Code)[1]

If the Certificates of Canvass are not complete

In case there are certificates of canvass which have not been submitted to the Speaker of the House of Representatives on account of missing election returns, a proclamation may be made if the missing certificates will not affect the results of the election.

But if the certificates of canvass which were not submitted on account of missing election returns will affect the results of the election, no proclamation shall be made. The Speaker shall immediately instruct the boards of canvassers concerned to obtain the missing election returns from the boards of election inspectors or, if the returns have been lost or destroyed upon prior authority from the COMELEC, to use any authentic copy of said election returns for the purpose of conducting the canvass, and thereafter issue the certificates of canvass.  The certificates of canvass shall be immediately transmitted to the House Speaker.

Proclamation shall be made only upon submission of all certificates of canvass or when the missing certificates of canvass will not affect the results of the election. (Article II, Section 20)

When other candidates are tied

In other instances where there are 2 or more candidates receiving an equal and highest number of votes, or in cases where 2 or more candidates are to be elected for the same position and two or more candidates received the same number of votes for the last place in the number to be elected, the board of canvassers, after recording this fact in its minutes, shall by resolution, upon 5 days notice to all the tied candidates, hold a special public meeting at which the board of canvassers shall proceed to the drawing of lots of the candidates who have tied and shall proclaim as elected the candidates who may be favored by luck, and the candidates so proclaimed shall have the right to assume office in the same manner as if he had been elected by plurality of vote.  (Article XIX, Section 240)

If there are pre-proclamation controversies

It must first be noted that as to the elections, returns, and qualifications of all members of Congress, elective regional, provincial and city officials, the COMELEC is the sole judge. (Article XXI, Section 249)

As regards pre-proclamation controversies, the COMELEC has exclusive jurisdiction. It may motu proprio (or on its own) or upon written petition, and after due notice and hearing, order the partial or total suspension of the proclamation of any candidate-elect or annul partially or totally any proclamation, if one has been made, as the evidence shall warrant. (Article XX, Section 242)

We won’t go into the details of election protests. They can be messy and very political.


[1]  Batas Pambansa Blg. 881, December 3, 1985.  http://www.comelec.gov.ph/laws/omnibus_election_code/oec_art2.html

NEWER POST       |       PREVIOUS POST