Thursday, January 9, 2014

TIME’S UP! (Time to change from Philippine Time to Philippine Standard Time)

By Siesta-friendly

It’s time we equate “Philippine Time” with Philippine Standard Time. It is best we all do now that all national and local government offices are required to “display the Philippine Standard Time (PST) on their official time devices, including bundy clocks, in accordance with the official time being provided by the Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration (PAGASA)” pursuant to Sec. 2 of R.A. 10535 (or “The Philippine Standard Time (PST) Act of 2013”).

And, yes, there are consequences - although only on a little segment of the private sector. Under Sec. 7 of RA 10535, “[o]wners of private television and radio stations who shall fail to calibrate and synchronize their time devices with the PST during their broadcast shall, upon hearing and due proceedings, be penalized with a fine of not less than Thirty thousand pesos (P30,000.00) but not more than Fifty thousand pesos (P50,000.00) and in case of second offense, revocation and cancellation of their franchises to operate.” It does seem a bit extreme for missing a second or a minute or two.

Why doesn’t the law penalize government offices for failing “to calibrate and synchronize their time devices with the PST”? And why not also punish all private offices or institutions for the same failure? Who knows?

Section 3 of Implementing Rules and Regulations, however, provide that “[a]ny government employee or office, who is principally responsible for the implementation of the law, shall fail to calibrate and synchronize the devises with the PST shall be administratively liable without prejudice to any civil or criminal liability that may be appropriately imposed.”  Who are “principally responsible for the implementation of the law”?  Who knows?

Go to http://kidlat.pagasa.dost.gov.ph/ourtime.shtml and follow the instructions -

Step 1: Click or select "Date and Time" in system icon tray located in the lower right corner of the taskbar.

Step 2: "Date and Time" window will pop up. Then Click or select "change date and time settings..."

Step 3: "Date and Time Setting" window will show. Then select the tab "Internet Time".

Step 4: After selecting the "Internet Time" tab, click or select "Change settings..." button and "Internet Time Settings" window will pop up.

Step 5: In "Internet Time Settings", type "ntp.pagasa.dost.gov.ph" in server textbox highlighted in red, then press "Update now".

Step 6: For the last part, wait for your computer to sync to the server. A message will inform you if update is successful.

NOTE: If you notice that after synching, your computer clock didn’t match the PhST, just keep on refreshing until it finally synched with PhST. It is normal at the beginning, because it will take time to load a page. Refresh it at least three times (3x) until it displayed the correct PhST.

Its a new year and its time we have a shed an old bad trait.  Make Philippine Standard Time the new Philippine time.

NEWER POST       |       PREVIOUS POST

Thursday, December 12, 2013

DISCOUNTING INTENTIONS: DTI’s Diskwento Caravan

By Siesta-friendly

The Diskwento Caravan, according to DTI’s website “[s]tarted in 2008, … [as] a flagship project of DTI that aims to provide non-wage benefits for wage earners and employees to ease the consumers’ burden of rising prices of basic necessities and prime commodities.”

As early as November 14, 2013, or 6 days after Yolanda left thousands dead and injured and thousands more homeless, jobless, hungry, in desperate need of medical help, in search of loved ones, the government began the roll out of its Diskwento Caravans in Ormoc, Leyte.  Thus, within 6 days from the worst typhoon the country  and the biggest disaster area the country had ever seen, the government already saw consumers with demands and not victims in need.

Partnering with big manufacturers and distributers instead of serving calamity victims


In the past, the roll out of Diskwento Caravans has been described as a “fair”, i.e., a venue to sell and promote products.  In connection with one such event in July 2013, the DTI stated that “[m]anufacturer participants are no longer charged of overhead but given free venue, electricity, security and media promotion, among others”.   

All these make us wonder who the Diskwento Caravan primarily serves – the manufacturer or the consumer? And why proceed with this fair when Typhoon victims, in their desperation and need to survive, have resorted to looting and eating spoiled rice?

In defense of Diskwento Caravans, DTI Secretary Gregory L. Domingo, on November 26, 2013, said that “most [manufacturers and distributors] do not make money on their Diskwento Caravan Activities”.

Since not only are manufacturers and distributors benefitting from the free “media promotion” but some are also profiting from the sale of their goods to the victims, it has become less believable that the Diskwento Caravans are primarily to help calamity victims. 

Selling necessities to calamity victims

In the same November 26, 2013 statement, Secretary Domingo continues: “In calamity areas, the value of Diskwento Caravans is in providing the availability of non-relief item at a discounted price.  In the last 10 days in Samar/Leyte, we have provided many truckloads of bread, canned milk, assorted other canned goods, other types of beverage, sanitary napkins/panty liners and many other products that are otherwise unavailable in the area.  DTI’s 2nd Diskwento Caravan in Tacloban tomorrow will also include construction materials such as GI sheets, nails, etc. and products such as batteries, flashlights and other necessities.”  

The above statement implies that “bread, canned milk, assorted other canned goods, other types of beverage, sanitary napkins/panty liners and many other products that are otherwise unavailable in the area” are non-relief items. Are rice, water, sardines and corned beef the only relief goods?  So when local and foreign donations include “bread, canned milk, assorted other canned goods, other types of beverage, sanitary napkins/panty liners”, are these items taken out because they are not “relief goods”? 

Secretary Domingo also mentioned selling “other necessities” to typhoon victims.  What “necessities” are not considered “relief goods”?  Aren’t those terms synonymous with each other?

Neglecting local livelihood while promoting big manufacturers and distributers

Secretary Domingo then attempts to elicit empathy by stating: “DTI has a very meager budget and gets zero donations.  The Diskwento Caravans especially in areas in Leyte/Samar have been conducted at great sacrifice by our employees around the region and by the employees of our partner companies as they effectively take 30 hour shifts from the time they leave Cebu port on a RORO to Leyte/Samar to the time they get back to Cebu after holding the Diskwento Caravan without the benefit of a hotel room or assured toilet facilities.” 

The DTI’s activities on behalf of manufacturers and distributors are not the selfless activities they are trying to make it seem.  The more the goods sell, the more media promotion and goodwill these manufacturers and distributors will earn and the more favorable the Department of Trade and Industry will be in the eyes of these manufacturers and distributors. 

In connection with this defense of Diskwento Caravans, Presidential Communication Operations Office Secretary Herminio Coloma, on November 27, 2013, said that “the discount caravan aims to restart and energize commercial activities in calamity areas where public markets and retail stores were destroyed.”  

The only way we can think that Diskwento Caravans can help calamity areas “restart and energize commercial activities” is if the Diskwento Caravan goods are sold to stores which will in turn sell them to consumers.  How then does this help victims who, while still desperate for relief, now have to pay for goods with the local store’s mark-up? 

If the DTI really wanted to “restart and energize commercial activities in calamity areas” then they should have given start-up funds to support local livelihood.  The predominant economic activities in the hardest hit areas, Leyte and Samar, are fishing and agriculture.  It doesn’t take a lot of money to “restart and energize” these commercial activities.    And, how does selling “bread, canned milk, assorted other canned goods, other types of beverage, sanitary napkins/panty liners and many other products that are otherwise unavailable in the area” to fisherman and farmers “restart and energize” the latter’s  commercial activities?

Since no one person seems to be in charge of relief operations, it would be difficult to stop the Diskwento Caravans.  Each government arm seems to be doing only what it knows best which may not necessarily be the best for the calamity victims.  But good intentions are not enough at a time like this.  So, let us just do as much we can to reach out to as many victims as we can.  We all know by now we can do so much better than our government.

NEWER POST       |       PREVIOUS POST

Wednesday, November 13, 2013

IN ONE EAR OUT THE OTHER (The storm surge we were advised of but did nothing about)

By Siesta-friendly

Did authorities fail to explain to those living near the coastal areas where Typhoon Yolanda (Haiyan, internationally) landed what storm surges are? 

For how else do we explain the aftermath? Dozens (potentially, hundreds) of drowned bodies on the street, on the fields, inside buildings. How much more were taken by the sea?

As early as 2 days before Yolanda’s landfall, Philstar published PAGASA’s (Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration) advisory that “[s]torm surges are also expected in the coastal areas of Catanduanes, Albay, Sorsogon, Eastern Visayas, Dinagat Island and Siargao Island as early as Thursday evening and over the seaboards of Visayas and southern Luzon area by Friday and Saturday morning”. 

A day before landfall, ANC posted an update from PAGASA which included the information that “[t]hose living in coastal areas under signals 3 and 2 are alerted against storm surges with waves reaching 7 meters in height.”

It is inconceivable that people near coastal areas would have stayed around had they known they could be engulfed by 7 meters of water.  Let’s take for example Tacloban City which is almost entirely surrounded by water and almost entirely flat land with no higher ground to escape to from floods.  Instead of advising Tacloban residents to prepare for the Typhoon, they should have all been evacuated. Who stays, and allows people to stay, behind knowing 7 meters of water are about to surge?

A day after landfall, ABS-CBN news anchor Ted Failon – who personally witnessed the devastation in Tacloban City – while reporting on air admitted that he had reported PAGASA’s advisory on potential storm surges but said he didn’t realize what it was until it actually happened.

Perhaps we need to learn how to impart information.  It obviously isn’t enough to disseminate information.  PAGASA notified us about storm surges.  Who explained what they were? NO ONE.  Who prepared for them? NO ONE.

Yet, it is not difficult to learn about storm surges on the internet. Even PAGASA’s website has a definition of a storm surge (for short, an inundation and not mere waves) with corresponding photo -


Often, we attribute the devastation caused by weather disturbances to “Acts of God”.  Yet “acts of God” are beyond human control.  During at least 3 days before Haiyan’s landfall, the whole world already knew and talked about Haiyan with words like “perfect storm” and “one of the strongest in the world”. Was the loss of lives really beyond human control, especially having been advised of storm surges in coastal areas which seemed to have drowned so many people in precisely those areas? 

It is supremely unfortunate that we had to experience storm surges for us to prepare for it … next time.  Simple research would have been enough to inform us that entire coastal areas should have been completely evacuated before the storm hit.


NEWER POST       |       PREVIOUS POST

Tuesday, October 29, 2013

PREPARING FOR AN EARTHQUAKE: Learning from the Metro Manila Earthquake Impact Reduction Study

By Siesta-friendly

The 7.2 magnitude earthquake last week that severely damaged infrastructure in Bohol and Cebu and caused about 200 deaths has moved us to be more concerned about the high-intensity earthquake that is expected to occur in Metro Manila. 

Apart from the fact that we reside in Metro Manila, it is also where the government and its departments, agencies and bureaus are headquartered, where the legislature convenes, where the highest levels of the judiciary are located, where news and information services are based, where much economic and financial activity are centered.  If Metro Manila is devastated, it would be as if the entire country were devastated.

Between 2002-2004, apparently mindful of the just-around-the–corner disaster, Japan International Cooperation Agency (JICA), MMDA and PHIVOLCS made a study called the Metro Manila Earthquake Impact Reduction Study (MMEIRS) to “1) Evaluate seismic hazards, damages and vulnerability of Metro Manila”, and “2) Prepare framework of master plan for earthquake disaster management.”

Looking around our concrete jungle, it’s hard to imagine how we implemented, and learned from, the MMEIRS report.   Watching and reading the news (including learning about the government’s delayed and inadequate assistance to the earthquake victims in Bohol), we know that we are not prepared in terms of our infrastructure, organization, resources and preparedness.  

There are several possible sources of an earthquake that will affect Metro Manila.  But based on the MMEIRS study the “West Valley Fault (WFV) and the East Valley Fault (EFV), which run north to south along the west and east edge of the Marikina Valley are thought to pose the greatest threat to Metropolitan Manila”.

There are many ways we should be addressing the threat, preventively and reactively.  To help envision what we should be doing pre- and post- earthquake, we have taken an excerpt from the MMEIRS report projecting and detailing the immediate effects of a 7.2 magnitude earthquake in Metro Manila. 

The scenarios should help us realize what we could do now to meet the needs of the disaster we all know is coming.


1)      Day 1

Evening. August 26, 2003 is a typical Tuesday, the traffic, the crowd, the sunset at 6:14 as announced by PAGASA. Except that today you are not coming home from work, but from the WORKSHOP at Shangrila Hotel. You are almost home, looking forward to a simple tinolang Manok that you know is stewing in your kitchen.

You get off from the bus and navigate your village road. As you are walking the last few meters to your gate, you feel a sudden jolt. It sort of pushes you forward. At first you don’t know what it is. But the ground continues shaking, up and down, sideways, getting stronger every second. You fall to the ground, unable to keep standing. You hear a booming sound. You hear screams from people inside their homes. You hear breaking glasses. Telephone and power poles sway violently. Then the power goes off. In front of you, the village road is heaving, as if you are riding waves. The strong ground shaking goes on for 50 seconds. It is the longest 50 seconds of your life.

The ground shaking has stopped but you remain on the ground, still feeling dizzy. You try to get up, your knees shake under you. People start pouring out of their homes. Panic and confusion are everywhere. Occasional cries and wails add to the confusion. Around you are toppled poles and fences, collapsed houses, cracked roads, broken water pipes.

You go home as quickly as you can. You recognize your family amongst the crowd on the village street. They are all home, shaken but unhurt. You let out a sigh of relief and say a prayer of thanks. But your family refuses to enter your home. A barangay leader gives instructions to you and your neighbors to move to the basketball court to keep away from objects that may fall or topple.

You move your family as instructed. You try to make a call to other relatives but your mobile phone has no signal. Still you dialed a number. It didn’t work. You finally walked back to check your home. But home is something you barely recognize. Everything seems to be piled up on the floor – appliances, shelves, books, lighting fixtures, family portraits, clothes, your prized Jollibee collectibles, even the tinola dinner.

Among the pile of mess on the floor, you pick up the old battery-operated transistor radio that your mother-in-law refuses to part with. You turn it on. At first you only get static. You play with the dials and catch this piece of news: PHIVOLCS issued a bulletin that says a devastating earthquake, with magnitude 7.2 generated by the nearby West Valley Fault, hit Metropolitan Manila. The ground shaking was felt at PEIS VIII in Metropolitan Manila. Weak to strong aftershocks are expected.

You rummage for blankets and go back to the basketball court. You try to think happy thoughts knowing this would be a very long night. You stay tuned in to the radio. News trickles in.

-          There is a major power outage in Metropolitan Manila as well as in the neighboring provinces in Luzon.
-          Telephone lines, including cellular networks, are down.
-          Many residential houses are heavily damaged and collapsed.
-          Some school buildings collapsed.
-          A few hospitals are heavily damaged, ICU patients need to be transferred, and other patients need to be evacuated.
-          Fires broke out in several residential clusters, chemical plants, and few other factories and hospitals.
-          Hundreds, if not thousands, are estimated trapped dead or injured from collapsed or burning houses, buildings and factories.
-          Abandoned cars, some damaged by falling objects, littered the streets of        Metropolitan Manila.

Within the next few hours after the earthquake, the National Disaster Coordinating Council convened. Not all the member agencies have representatives immediately available.

2)      Day 2-3

You are one of the more fortunate. No one is injured in your household. But your house is damaged and you are not sure if it will survive the next strong aftershock. Also, food and drinking water are becoming scarce. The barangay leaders and community members work together to provide for everyone.

Overnight you felt several moderate to weak after shocks. There is still no electricity, telephone communication, and water. Haze from burning buildings darkens the horizon. Fires still spread unabated.

News reports give more dismal picture of the extent of damage brought by the earthquake:

The President declares a state of calamity. She mobilizes the Armed Forces of the Philippines for rescue, clearing of debris, and construction of temporary shelters. She suspends schools and offices.

Philippine flags fly at half-mast.

PHIVOLCS confirms movement of the West Valley Fault after it conducted an aerial survey over Metropolitan Manila.

Volunteer rescue groups from Olongapo and Baguio City coordinate with the NDCC.

Back-up power generators are available only in critical public and private offices.

There are more reports of collapsed houses, now numbering in the thousands, mid-to high-rise buildings, and major bridges.

Many roads are impassable.

The LRT and MRT railways remain standing but not operational.

Reports of casualties continue to rise to several thousands.

Several thousand families have lost their homes and begin to occupy open spaces.

People rescued from collapsed buildings show crush syndromes and given medical attention on site in temporary medical shelters. They cannot be transferred immediately to hospitals because ambulances cannot get through the roads littered with debris and cars.

The police contain random acts of looting.

3)      Day 4-7

You continue to occupy the basketball court. There is still no power, communication and water supply.

In the tent clusters that sprouted in parks and other open spaces, the lack of clean water supply makes the outbreak of infectious diseases a threat.

In hospitals, injured patients are lined up even along corridors. Again, the lack of clean water is a major problem.

Many people, especially children, suffer from shock, traumatized by the strong ground shaking, the sight of destruction, or being temporarily trapped.

Bodies exhumed from rubbles are lined up along the streets. The air has the distinct smell of decay.

International volunteer rescue teams coordinate with the NDCC. Rescue will continue in the next few days.

Clearing of debris will continue for several weeks to months. Bodies will continue to be recovered among building debris.

Relief goods are distributed in evacuation centers. Some evacuation centers receive more relief goods than others.

Neighboring Asian countries pledge and extend technical, medical and other forms of support.

The Government appeals to those with capabilities to join forces in responding to the disaster. Recovery and rehabilitation will take years and years.


The MEEIRS report (perhaps politely) omits the added chaos resulting from government corruption or political machinations in providing (or not providing) relief.  The latest example of this being the reported actions of Maribohoc Mayor Leoncio Evasco Jr. in halting the Red Cross’ activities of doling out relief goods to Bohol quake victims because the Red Cross refused to hand over the relief goods to the local government for the latter to apportion and distribute the goods themselves. 

Not to mention the additional mess arising from the likely lack of government funds and resources to help everyone. The Bohol earthquake occurred October 15, 2013. Philstar reports today, October 24, that Department of Budget and Management Secretary Florencio Abad “said the entire P7.5 billion calamity fund, as well as the P1 billion contingency fund “have already been wiped out.” Due to the disasters that fell upon different parts of the nation during the previous months, the funds were gone even before the earthquake happened.

So how do we prepare for the natural and man-made disasters?  Try not to rely on the government too much. We are the best people to save ourselves. Talk to a structural engineer to check where your building/home is vulnerable and retrofit accordingly.  Periodically have earthquake drills or discuss (and brainstorm) with family or co-workers ways to prevent damage/harm, and exit the house/building, when an earthquake occurs.  Identify clear areas (parks and vacant lots away from structures that could topple or break) where you can camp out (for days) while you wait until the aftershocks end.  Identify where you can easily access clean water.  Purchase a fire extinguisher for when fire breaks out.  Prepare a first aid kit readily accessible for when you are rushing to get out of the house/building when the tremors start.  Have a reliable radio handy. Always have enough stock of water, medicines, batteries, flashlights, canned goods, crackers, other emergency supplies.  

We may sound alarmist but we can’t turn a blind eye to what we know is a disaster that is sure to happen. 


NEWER POST       |       PREVIOUS POST

Thursday, October 17, 2013

BULLISH ON ANTI-BULLYING: Anti-Bullying Act of 2013

By Siesta-friendly

The Anti-Bullying Act of 2013 (R.A. 10627) was just signed into law last month. The title of the Act “An Act Requiring All Elementary And Secondary Schools To Adopt Policies To Prevent And Address The Acts Of Bullying In Their Institutions” is telling in that anti-bullying is legally proscribed only at the elementary and secondary levels.

Bullying, definition

Anyway, the definition of bullying under the Act seems to be all-encompassing, covering physical and emotional harm, and including in its scope bullying via written, verbal or electronic means.

Bullying is defined as -

“any severe or repeated use by one or more students of a written, verbal or electronic expression, or a physical act or gesture, or any combination thereof, directed at another student that has the effect of actually causing or placing the latter in reasonable fear of physical or emotional harm or damage to his property; creating a hostile environment at school for the other student; infringing on the rights of the other student at school; or materially and substantially disrupting the education process or the orderly operation of a school; such as, but not limited to, the following:

a.       Any unwanted physical contact between the bully and the victim like punching, pushing, shoving, kicking, slapping, tickling, headlocks, inflicting school pranks, teasing, fighting and the use of available objects as weapons;
b.      Any act that causes damage to a victim’s psyche and/or emotional well-being;
c.       Any slanderous statement or accusation that causes the victim undue emotional distress like directing foul language or profanity at the target, name-calling, tormenting and commenting negatively on victim’s looks, clothes and body; and
d.      Cyber-bullying or any bullying done through the use of technology or any electronic means. (Sec. 2)

Required Anti-Bullying Policies

Of course, the Act doesn’t stop at defining the prohibited acts but also requires schools to “adopt policies to address the existence of bullying in their respective institutions. Such policies shall be regularly updated and, at a minimum, shall include provisions which:

(a)    Prohibit the following acts:

(1)    Bullying on school grounds; property immediately adjacent to school grounds; at school-sponsored or school-related activities, functions or programs whether on or off school grounds; at school bus stops; on school buses or other vehicles owned, leased or used by a school; or through the use of technology or an electronic device owned, leased or used by a school;
(2)    Bullying at a location, activity, function or program that is not school-related and through the use of technology or an electronic device that is not owned, leased or used by a school if the act or acts in question create a hostile environment at school for the victim, infringe on the rights of the victim at school, or materially and substantially disrupt the education process or the orderly operation of a school; and
(3)    Retaliation against a person who reports bullying, who provides information during an investigation of bullying, or who is a witness to or has reliable information about bullying;

(b)   Identify the range of disciplinary administrative actions that may be taken against a perpetrator for bullying or retaliation which shall be commensurate with the nature and gravity of the offense: Provided, That, in addition to the disciplinary sanctions imposed upon a perpetrator of bullying or retaliation, he/she shall also be required to undergo a rehabilitation program which shall be administered by the institution concerned. The parents of the said perpetrator shall be encouraged by the said institution to join the rehabilitation program;

(c)    Establish clear procedures and strategies for:

(1)    Reporting acts of bullying or retaliation;
(2)    Responding promptly to and investigating reports of bullying or retaliation;
(3)    Restoring a sense of safety for a victim and assessing the student’s need for protection;
(4)    Protecting from bullying or retaliation of a person who reports acts of bullying, provides information during an investigation of bullying, or is witness to or has reliable information about an act of bullying; and
(5)    Providing counseling or referral to appropriate services for perpetrators, victims and appropriate family members of said students;

(d)   Enable students to anonymously report bullying or retaliation: Provided, however, That no disciplinary administrative action shall be taken against a perpetrator solely on the basis of an anonymous report;
(e)   Subject a student who knowingly makes a false accusation of bullying to disciplinary administrative action;
(f)     Educate students on the dynamics of bullying, the anti-bullying policies of the school as well as the mechanisms of such school for the anonymous reporting of acts of bullying or retaliation;
(g)    Educate parents and guardians about the dynamics of bullying, the anti-bullying policies of the school and how parents and guardians can provide support and reinforce such policies at home; and
(h)   Maintain a public record of relevant information and statistics on acts of bullying or retaliation in school: Provided, That the names of students who committed acts of bullying or retaliation shall be strictly confidential and only made available to the school administration, teachers directly responsible for the said students and parents or guardians of students who are or have been victims of acts of bullying or retaliation.” (Sec. 3)

Implementation of Anti-Bullying Policies

So how is the actual act of bullying addressed? Here’s the procedure:

“Any member of the school administration, student, parent or volunteer shall immediately report any instance of bullying or act of retaliation witnessed, or that has come to one’s attention, to the school principal or school officer or person so designated by the principal to handle such issues, or both. Upon receipt of such a report, the school principal or the designated school officer or person shall promptly investigate. If it is determined that bullying or retaliation has occurred, the school principal or the designated school officer or person shall:

a)      Notify the law enforcement agency if the school principal or designee believes that criminal charges under the Revised Penal Code may be pursued against the perpetrator;
b)      Take appropriate disciplinary administrative action;
c)       Notify the parents or guardians of the perpetrator; and
d)      Notify the parents or guardians of the victim regarding the action taken to prevent any further acts of bullying or retaliation.

If an incident of bullying or retaliation involves students from more than one school, the school first informed of the bullying or retaliation shall promptly notify the appropriate administrator of the other school so that both may take appropriate action.” (Sec. 4)

Other responsibilities

All elementary and secondary schools shall provide students and their parents or guardians a copy of the anti-bullying policies being adopted by the school. Such policies shall likewise be included in the school’s student and/or employee handbook and shall be conspicuously posted on the school walls and website, if there is any. (Sec. 3)

All schools shall inform their respective schools division superintendents in writing about the anti-bullying policies formulated within six (6) months from the effectivity of the Act. Such notification shall likewise be an administrative requirement prior to the operation of new schools. (Sec. 5)

Beginning with the school year after the effectivity of the Act, and every first week of the start of the school year thereafter, schools shall submit a report to their respective schools division superintendents all relevant information and statistics on acts of bullying or retaliation. The schools division superintendents shall compile these data and report the same to the Secretary of the DepED who shall likewise formally transmit a comprehensive report to the Committee on Basic Education of both the House of Representatives and the Senate. (Sec. 5)

The Department of Education (DepED) shall include in its training programs, courses or activities which shall provide opportunities for school administrators, teachers and other employees to develop their knowledge and skills in preventing or responding to any bullying act. (Sec. 3)

Penalties for Noncompliance

Unfortunately, the law has left it to the Secretary of the DepED “to prescribe the appropriate administrative sanctions on school administrators who shall fail to comply with the requirements under this Act.” The only possible penalty under the law is that “erring private schools shall likewise suffer the penalty of suspension of their permits to operate.” (Sec. 6)

Merriam-Webster defines a bully as one who frightens, threatens or insults another or one who treats another abusively. Bullies are everywhere, not just in the elementary and secondary levels. Despite the scope of the Act being limited to only the elementary and secondary levels, we hope other school levels – and even government and corporate entities - can be inspired, influenced and guided by this Act so they may set the appropriate policies and procedures to prevent, address, and punish bullies. 

Apart from bullies, we should also look out for their enablers like parents who tolerate or allow their children to bully others, or parents who defend their children’s bullying. Remember the father who reportedly slapped, threatened and poked a gun at a high school senior bullied by his own son (inside the Colegio de San Agustins Head Teacher’s Office no less).  

It is strikingly sad and necessary that the State has to step in to make children behave humanely as parents fail in making sure they do.  But bullying has devastating (even fatal) effects that we cannot be dependent on the weakness of families for failing to rear their children in fostering even a basic human value like respect.   


NEWER POST       |       PREVIOUS POST